Sep 02 2010

Rogue Waves for the Intensely Geeky

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

This is so cool, from Ars Technica:

Researchers have finally observed a special type of wave that has eluded experiments for almost 25 years. The Peregrine soliton, a special type of large wave that can retain its size and shape while traveling at a constant speed, has finally been demonstrated using light pulses traveling through fiber optics. Studies of the Peregrine soliton could help us model the rogue waves that can cause sudden disasters in the ocean, and give definite limits for a large class of solutions to the non-linear Schrodinger equation.

By timing the size and spacing of the breathers just right, researchers were able to get them to combine into a large, solitary wave—a Peregrine soliton. The scientists also found that waves that were more localized in space and time came together into a Peregrine soliton more easily. This may be the reason that rogue waves are relatively rare and seem to happen more often during storms.

Now that they have proved a Peregrine soliton can be created in the lab, the authors hope that meteorologists will be able to use this information to search for and forecast oceanic rogue waves. As a nice side benefit for mathematicians, many implications of the Peregrine soliton extend to nonlinear math in general. The nature of its formation and dynamics should place limits on a set of solutions to the nonlinear Schrodinger equation.

HT: Jonathan

No responses yet

Aug 31 2010

Do Nothing, But Look Good Doing It

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

Back when I was a kid, Greenpeace meant something. They were on the front lines. They were doing good stuff.

And now? They’re a freaking brand. This, from Unsuitablog:

Some of Motivaction’s past clients include Coca Cola, Imperial Tobacco, Unilever, McDonald’s and Mercedes Benz. On top of that, why is an environmental campaigning group employing a marketing company that promises to “achieve a high return on your marketing, communication and policy investments” to create brand and customer loyalty?

Because Greenpeace is a brand.

Greenpeace has become like any other corporation, using demographic segmentation techniques to analyse how best to brand themselves to attract customers. The survey itself, as well as questions on what environmental problems the survey-taker think are most important, also included sections on people’s opinions of rival organisations (including its radical splinter sea shepherd), opinions of Greenpeace itself and demographic questions. It seems that Greenpeace is trying to find its niche in a ‘marketplace’ of environmental organisations, using demographic analysis to find who its loyal ‘customers’ are to focus their branding on them.

So, Greenpeace supporters amongst you reading this: you are being analysed and treated as a consumer, marketed at and targeted with a brand to suit your “milieu”.

Is this what the environmental movement should be?

Whilst Greenpeace are busy spending supporters money on corporate branding and promoting the reform of Industrial Civilisation, the destruction of forests, pollution of oceans and the 6th mass extinction continues unabated. Activists need to see that Greenpeace and its colleagues (even Oxfam features as a client to Motivaction) are becoming brands, competing in a marketplace for your ‘custom’ – they’re turning our anger and activism into a consumer item. Activists need to see this and move beyond the corporatized NGOs and take real action, and show them that we won’t consume their corrupted vision of environmentalism.

I … have now discovered that Greenpeace Inc. is registered in the state of California as a Corporation; and thus the wheel turns further in favour of the corporate machine. Thanks for making my decisions so much easier, Greenpeace Inc.

The whole thing makes me really, really sad. Come on, Greenpeace. Do some work, and quit with the marketing.

No responses yet

Aug 29 2010

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-29

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

  • Today? We're taking it easy, sorting legos, and eating gorgeous organic watermelon the farmer picked for us himself. #notbacktoschool #
  • RT @SCKayaks: Speed record smashed. Tweeked the Torqeedo motor with a motor/shaft fairing and gained 2mph! Planning at 5.7 mph #kayaks #
  • RT @MomsRising: Wells Fargo wants to know what’s a-brewin’ in my uterus before they make me a loan.http://bit.ly/cDLwqb //Infuriating!! #
  • The marina has a Great Blue Heron in residence again! This makes me absurdly happy; the last one died in the oil spill 3 years ago. #
  • Barkissimo writes:: Barkissimo: The Thanksgiving Dinner http://barkissimo.com/blogissimo/?p=623 #
  • People who are honest, people who are direct, people who are straight with me, and people who say it like it is. #GratitudeList #

Powered by Twitter Tools

No responses yet

Aug 29 2010

Boat Kids in the Meadow

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

Since s/v Convivia moved in next door, we’ve been trying to hang out. This is one sunny afternoon in the winter that’s been serving as our “summer” here.

Waiting for our friends to arrive…

Rolling down the hill…

Sooooooo dizzy…

Helping Ruby roll. Miles, in the background, has it down.

Ruby headed off on her own a bit.

This one reminds me so much of Waterhouse’s “Miranda, the Tempest“.

4 responses so far

Aug 27 2010

If the Oceans Die, We Die

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

Yet another reason to love Captain Watson.

One response so far

Aug 26 2010

Recovery Is Slower Than You Think

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

For the last week, a Great Blue Heron has been fishing on the shoreline at our Marina. And I am ridiculously happy about that. It’s been three years since we had one in residence here.

On November 7 2007, due to a series of moves so stupid people are still figuring them out, the Cosco Busan hit one of the towers of the Bay Bridge, and dumped 53,500 gallons of oil into San Francisco Bay.

We were living here, then. I was pregnant with Aurora. The world smelled like diesel for weeks. The “cleanup” took even longer. And within a few months, it was declared “clean.”

I’m here to tell you, friends, that “clean” means very different things to bureaucrats, and to the people actually living on the water. As does “recovered.”

In the dinky little spill we lived through, everything died. We lost a harbor seal, we lost a nesting family of Great Blue Herons, we lost our entire crew of egrets and white herons and pelicans. Even the seagull population, normally tougher than tough, was decimated.

I don’t know how bad it was under the water; I can only guess it was at least as bad, or worse.

So when people start talking about the Gulf spill, and how it will be clean “sooner than we thought”, I am beyond incredulous. No one who’s actually lived through a spill, in close proximity to the biota affected, could possibly be saying such stupid things. Maybe to the casual observer, because the rainbow sheens are gone from the surface and the beaches no longer have black tar on them, things look OK. But it’s a measure of just how clueless we are about the natural world that when a giant swath of very visible wildlife just disappears, we can’t even tell.

For the Cosco Busan spill, there’s an argument about whether 2,000 birds, or 20,000 birds died. Anyone who lives here could tell you that it simply has to be the bigger number, just based on how many birds you could spot daily before the spill, and how many you could spot after, then multiply that by habitat locations. But lawsuits went with the number of birds the cleanup crews physically, directly encountered. Systemic myopia of the most egregious order.

I’m asking you all, pay attention to your wildlife. Be conscious of the birds, the mammals, even the insects. They all have a ton to tell you about where you are. Don’t wait until the disaster strikes before you pay attention.

One response so far

Aug 23 2010

Global Warming Is A Hoax

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

I adore Mark Morford, but I never thought I’d be quoting him on this blog. From his recent column in SFGate (emphasis mine):

Wouldn’t it be horrible if all this stunning, insanely mounting, irrefutable evidence — death, floods, fires, heat waves, the worst this and the most violent that in 1,000 years — were some sort of surefire, cumulative sign that we have, if not directly caused, then wildly accelerated and amplified the imminent implosion of this planet?

But we didn’t! And we haven’t! And we aren’t! I mean, whew.

…Even the U.N. secretary-general, Ban Ki-Moon, is in on it, coming back from Pakistan stunned and shaken by the epic flooding he witnessed there. “The magnitude of the problem; the world has never seen such a disaster. It’s much beyond anybody’s imagination,” he said, putting out the urgent call for more international aid. I mean, sure global warming is happening — even some of the more ignorant climate change deniers have had to reverse course on that — but humanity had nothing to do with it, OK? We don’t need to change our behavior one iota. If God wants another Ice Age or whatever, who are we to argue?

Have you seen the photos from the Gulf of Mexico, all shiny and clear thanks to toxic chemical dispersants, the miracle of ocean currents and armies of PR people who smell like hate? What happened to all the oil? It’s all gone, even though it’s really not! Absorbed into the planetary bloodstream like magic! Even the president is there, splashing around in waters that, not a month ago, had hundreds of million of gallons of crude oil and chemicals floating in it.

I just read the flooding in Pakistan has already caused more devastation than the 2004 tsunami in Asia, worse than the Haiti earthquake. One quarter of the country is underwater. They say Pakistan also just broke a record for the single highest temperature ever recorded on the Asian continent, at 128 degrees (16 other nations also met or broke heat records this year, too). That record was set in a city. Where people live. But not for very much longer, because they do not have giant air conditioners and pallets of Fiji water from Costco like we do, so they probably won’t survive.

Yes, it’s tragic. It’s unprecedented. It’s never happened like this before. Heck, even here in the eco-terrorist homeland of San Francisco, they say the change in ocean temperatures will soon mean Fog City will be entirely fog bound, edge to edge, nearly year round. But I repeat: It’s not our fault. Seven billion rapacious, industrialized bipeds have the impact of a feather.

I mean, so what if giant icebergs four times the size of Manhattan are suddenly breaking off in Greenland? That’s happening way, way up there. I’m overconsuming energy and blocking out inconvenient truths way, way down here. There is no cause/effect, no connection whatsoever, never mind that dark, nagging sense of self-wrought doom, deep in my bones. I know that’s just a liberal lie, an implant, completely futile — just like those failed climate talks in Copenhagen, and the soon-to-be-failed ones coming up shortly in Mexico. I mean, whew.

I love it. Love love love. “Seven billion rapacious, industrialized bipeds.” Fabulous. The bit about San Francisco in fog year-round makes perfect sense to me too, given the fact that we’re seeing about an hour of sun a day for the last five or six weeks.

2 responses so far

Aug 22 2010

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-22

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

Powered by Twitter Tools

No responses yet

Aug 21 2010

Scent of the Sea

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

…isn’t nearly as romantic as we think. Very cool article from the Telegraph:

Think of the tangy smell of the sea, so evocative of summer holidays, the scream of seagulls and sand between your toes. Where does it come from? Ozone? Fresh sea air? Actually, the truth is slightly less tantalising: it’s a gas released by bacteria.

Two years ago Andy Johnston, a professor of biology at the University of East Anglia, identified that the smell of the sea came from a molecule called dimethyl sulfide (DMS). Now, he has managed to crack the entire biochemical pathway by which the scent is produced. DMS turns out to be an important chemical found in many natural processes, such as cloud formation. Birds love the smell and will flock towards tiny concentrations. It’s even added to processed foods to give a savoury note: small amounts can impart the flavour of cabbages, tomatoes, butter and cream – even lemons or roast chicken, according to Prof Johnston.

“This is just the start,” says Prof Johnston, “We need to know more. But one thing I have learnt along the way is that it is microbes that drive this planet – everything else on earth is mere decoration.”

HT: Laura

No responses yet

Aug 19 2010

How Blue is Your Hurricane?

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

This, from National Geographic (one of the best sources I’ve found for info on changing ocean trends):

For centuries, artists from Hokusai to Hopper have used the ocean‘s colors to move people. Now a new study says they have the power to move hurricanes too.

What’s more, global warming may already be changing the ocean’s color—and therefore helping to determine who hurricanes will hit, and who they’ll spare.

Led by oceanographer Anand Gnanadesikan, the study used computer simulations to look for links between ocean color and strong tropical cyclones—called hurricanes in the North Atlantic Ocean and the northeastern Pacific and known as typhoons in the northwestern Pacific.

“Our group develops climate models,” said Gnanadesikan, of the U.S. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in Princeton New Jersey. “One of my jobs is to try to make those more realistic.”

One way to make the models more realistic is to look more closely at little-studied variables, such as ocean color.

In the North Pacific the predominant color is green, thanks to an abundance of minute, chlorophyll-packed plants called phytoplankton.

By absorbing sunlight, the floating plants help keep the ocean surface relatively warm. When there are fewer of them, the sun’s heat concentrates deeper down.

(Related: “Strongest Hurricanes May Double in Frequency, Study Says.”)

Clear Waters Make Hurricanes Hug Equator

In their climate model, the researchers reduced the plankton in North Pacific gyres—vast spiraling currents that can span an entire ocean.

“The gyres are already pretty clear, and we made them completely clear,” said Gnanadesikan, whose study is to be published in a future issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

By clarifying the waters in the gyres, the team robbed the gyres’ shallowest waters of heat—a crucial change, since warm surface water is fuel for strong tropical cyclones.

Tropical cyclones tend to form along the Equator, over the warm waters of the tropics, then move northward or southward into the subtropics. In the northwestern Pacific, for example, cyclones generally drift north and hit Japan and China.

But in the computer model—with the North Pacific gyres drained of color and heat—the number of hurricanes moving northward out of the tropics dropped by two-thirds, versus the normal number. The storms simply couldn’t continue on without warm surface water to sustain them.

With clearer seas to the north, the cyclones tended to hug the Equator and hit the Philippines, Vietnam, and Thailand.

“This was a huge, huge impact from removing all color” from the gyres, Gnandesikan said. “I was really quite surprised.”

Global Warming’s Paintbrush

Gyres are considered “‘ocean deserts’ because of their low level of productivity”—their ability to foster life-forms, such as phytoplankton—said biogeochemist Manfredi Manizza.

The gyres, will likely “become even less productive because of the warming of the climate,” said Manizza, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, who was not part of the new study.

This clearing of the oceans may already be happening, according to a recent study in the journal Nature.

As the ocean surface warms, it mixes less with cooler, deeper waters, which contain much of the oceans nutrients, the Nature study says. As shallow-water plants, phytoplankton are therefore starving to death, according to the findings.

But Gnanadesikan, the computer model study leader, said that other studies have found a rise in plankton in recent decades.

“The big problem in estimating chlorophyll changes [in the ocean],” he said, “is that there’s really only one good record, from a satellite that’s been up for 12 years”—NASA’s Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor.

In the future, though, Gnanadesikan and his team aim to use ongoing satellite data to track changes in ocean color, and to see if there’s a real-world link to tropical cyclone paths.

One response so far

Aug 17 2010

Kayak Maintenance

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

As I’ve mentioned before, several of our Marina neighbors stow their kayaks in front of our boat. In exchange for that, we often borrow them. Sadly, our friend Matthew sold his boat, and was giving his two-seater sit-inside boat to his brother, for him to use with his kids. Matthew came out a few days before his brother was due to stop by, to get the boat ready to transport.

Despite the water being gross (as I’ve mentioned a lot), it’s got a ton of small invertebrates in it, including the ubiquitous and disgusting skeleton shrimp, which ball up and mass on things. Between them and the baby barnacles and other sessile wonders, if you’re going to clean something that’s been in the water a while, you need a blade scraper.

Luckily for Matthew, it was a lovely day, and the kids wanted to help.

2 responses so far

Aug 15 2010

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-15

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

Powered by Twitter Tools

No responses yet

Aug 15 2010

Wicked Claustrophobia

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

No, I’m not talking about being on a small boat with a big family. I’m talking about being in the Bay.

Because we live on water, we keep thinking of this stuff we float on as the sea. But it really isn’t. It’s sludge and grunge and the effluent of the surrounding urban population. It’s more than a little nauseating.

Despite the fact that I spent a summer scraping boat bottoms for a living up in Trinidad Harbor one year, I cannot make myself get in this water. It’s ridiculous to pay someone to do what I can perfectly well do myself, but every time I look in this water, I just get skeeved out. So in the meantime, stuff grows on the hull…

We took a trip to Santa Cruz a few days ago. I remember when being in that Bay made me kinda claustrophobic. Now, it seems like endless vistas. And the kids, despite being borderline hypothermic, loved it. Real waves! Water that neither stunk nor left stains on you. Water that wasn’t crawling with odd worms and invertebrates. Water you could play in.

Another boater, in the next marina over, declared on his blog that he was so bored with sailing the Bay, that he was considering ramming the ferries, just for a change up. I know precisely what he means. We tend to sail in circles a lot… loop out to the Bridge and back, loop around Angel Island, loop around Treasure Island. Head to Ruby’s if you want to laugh at the drunk people, head to Sam’s if you want to have to fight the seagulls for your food. Go out at night if you want to see the sparklies, go out during a holiday if you want to get hassled by the police boats. Lather, rinse, repeat. There is, incidentally, no direction you can go where you can’t hear traffic.

It’s not that I’m being exhaustive. We haven’t sailed the Delta. There are a few other spots we could go. But every time we leave the dock, “out” calls to me. Out out out out out. Out.

I know that for people all over the world, San Francisco Bay, and the Golden Gate Bridge, are iconic. To me, the bridge is looking more and more like a wall; a wall I have got to get outside of soon.

3 responses so far

Aug 13 2010

Friday the 13th — Superstition

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

One response so far

Aug 11 2010

We Set the Date

Published by Laureen under Uncategorized

March 20, 2011.

The vernal equinox, in fact.

::whew::

4 responses so far

Next »